<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis on Obama: The First Woman President?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://velvetbanana.com/analysis-on-obama-the-first-woman-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://velvetbanana.com/analysis-on-obama-the-first-woman-president/</link>
	<description>A Pro Feminism &#38; Equal Rights Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://velvetbanana.com/analysis-on-obama-the-first-woman-president/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://velvetbanana.com/analysis-on-obama-the-first-woman-president/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>one point here - &#039;doing gender&#039; does not, most emphatically, refer to only people conducting themselves in accord with gender norms or stereotypes.  

also - the author&#039;s reinscription of gendered norms is inversely sexist. its a subtle reading to understand the aggressiveness of this characterization, i am impressed by your acumen. but don&#039;t dismiss your original thought on the basis that his inquiry warrants such a set of claims... remember, who is the audience here?  perhaps if everyone could read between the lines like you have then we might excuse his culpability... my guess is the typical NEWSWEEK reader is not going to bring such a critical eye to the matter.

nice work... i enjoy reading your posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one point here &#8211; &#8216;doing gender&#8217; does not, most emphatically, refer to only people conducting themselves in accord with gender norms or stereotypes.  </p>
<p>also &#8211; the author&#8217;s reinscription of gendered norms is inversely sexist. its a subtle reading to understand the aggressiveness of this characterization, i am impressed by your acumen. but don&#8217;t dismiss your original thought on the basis that his inquiry warrants such a set of claims&#8230; remember, who is the audience here?  perhaps if everyone could read between the lines like you have then we might excuse his culpability&#8230; my guess is the typical NEWSWEEK reader is not going to bring such a critical eye to the matter.</p>
<p>nice work&#8230; i enjoy reading your posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->